Bistline v. Eberle
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McQUADE, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff and the defendants Eberles are practicing attorneys, duly admitted to practice in Idaho.
In 1955 defendant Whitman, a Washington resident, loaned Mr. and Mrs. Green, Idaho residents, a certain sum of money. This loan was evidenced by a note and secured by a mortgage on the Greens’ Idaho real estate. In January of 1956 plaintiff, as attorney for the Greens, informed Mrs. Whitman that the note was usurious hy Idaho law and that he had advised the Greens to make no further payments. Being advised of the plaintiff’s claim, Mrs. Whitman’s Washington attorneys…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Andrus v. IrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Saulls v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Gough v. Tribune-Journal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Gough v. Tribune-Journal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Berry v. KoehlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Charles R. Pottenger v. Potlatch Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- McNett v. McNettIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Moritz v. Medical Arts Clinic, P. C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Miller v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Irish v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.