Legal Opinion
Roses Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 16, 1991No. 84-05-00632PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This case is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the agency record. Plaintiffs, representatives of United States fresh cut flower producers, contend that in its second remand determination, issued on April 1, 1991, the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) violated this court’s instructions contained in the remand order and issued a final negative countervailing duty determination that is not supported by substantial evidence on the record and is contrary to law. For the reasons set forth in the following paragraphs, the court finds that Commerce’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cabot Corporation v. The United States, Hules Mexicanos, S.A. And Negromex, S.A., Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Cabot Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Ppg Industries, Inc. v. United States, Vitro Flotado, S.A. And Vidrio Plano De Mexico, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- British Steel PLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020