Nunn Bush Shoe Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiffs, Nunn Bush Shoe Company and Weyco Group Inc. (collectively “Nunn Bush”), move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the rules of this Court. Plaintiffs maintain that they are so entitled because their entries were liquidated by operation of law at the duty rate asserted at the time of entry. Thus, plaintiffs contend that Customs’ latter liquidation was unlawful and is consequently void.
Defendant, while opposing plaintiffs’ motion, cross moves for summary judgment on grounds that Customs properly liquidated the entries at the rates established pursuant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Phone-Mate, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Canadian Fur Trappers Corp., and Meldisco, a Division of Melville Corp. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- American Permac, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Canadian Fur Trappers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rheem Metalurgica S/A v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Dal-Tile Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- International Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- American Permac, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Wolff Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.