Legal Opinion

Grotte v. Rachman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1926No. 23662PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This action was commenced in the district court for Douglas county to recover $11,000 with interest at 7 per cent, per annum from June 10, 1919. Plaintiff contends that on or about such date she was the owner and holder of stock in the Burgess Nash Company, a corporation of Douglas county, of the par value of $11,000; that she and defendants were, and had been for some years, close personal friends; that she was without business knowledge, and relied solely on the representations of defendants; that they promised her that, if she would turn the Burgess Nash stock over to them and accept in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carter White Lead Co. v. KinlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Fremont Carriage Manufacturing Co. v. ThomsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hankwitz v. BarrettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Griffin v. Bankers Realty Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Armstrong v. OrlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Haworth v. HubbardIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ashley and Gibbs v. PrestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Magee v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Rath v. Selection Research, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Reichert v. MulderNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API