Legal Opinion

International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 1889No. 6343PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Travis. Tried below before Hon. A. S. Walker. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

ACKER, Presiding Judge.

Appellee was employed by appellant as switchman in its yard at Austin, and had been so employed for about nine months on the 3d day of June, 1886, when, on that day, while engaged in uncoupling cars, his foot became fastened between the guard rail and track rail, and he was run over hy a car and received injuries that necessitated the amputation of his leg. This suit was brought to recover damages for the injury.

Appellee alleged in his petition that “owing to the insufficient manner in which the guard rail was constructed it prevented his foot from being withdrawn when…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Railway Co. v. OramTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Missouri Pacific R. R. Co. v. LydeTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Austin & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BeattyTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Reynolds v. Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Brayman v. Russell & Pugh Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Bering Manufacturing Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API