Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific R. R. Co. v. Lyde

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1882No. Case No. 1279PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Anderson. Tried below before the Hon. Peyton F. Edwards. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Bonner, Associate Justice.

The first error assigned is that “ The court erred in its charge to the jury in this: The jury were told in the charge that defendant is bound to protect his servants from injury by reason of latent or unseen defects, so far as human care and foresight can accomplish the result; and erred in refusing the first charge requested by the defendant, for the reason that this measure of duty is greater and more stringent as between master and servant than that prescribed by law, and that requested in said first charge, viz., ordinary care.”

*508That portion of the charge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Railway Co. v. OramTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hunt v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. Guengerech v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HannigTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. L. N. Brunswig & Co. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Howard Oil Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API