Legal Opinion

Austin & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Beatty

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1889No. 6122PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Travis. Tried below before Hon. A. S. Walker.

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, Presiding Judge.—

Joseph Beatty was employed by appellant to place numbers upon the bridges on its road between Austin and Burnet. A special train, consisting of a locomotive, several fiat cars, and a passenger coach attached to the rear end, went out from Austin under the personal control of Leitnaker, appellant’s general superintendent, carrying appellee and other employes. The train was stopped about sixty or eighty yards from bridge eight, and Leitnaker directed appellee to go forward to the bridge and nail the board upon which the bridge number was painted on the end of the cap of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Austin v. RitzTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. St, Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TouheySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  4. Chicago, Kansas & Western Railroad v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. Houston City Street Railway Co. v. MedlenkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API