Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Gillenwater, II

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 11, 2014No. 12-30379, 13-30284PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Associate Justice (Ret.):

Defendant Charles Lee Gillenwater, II, was charged with two counts of transmitting threatening interstate communications and one count of transmitting threatening communications by United States mail. After determining that Gillenwater was not competent to stand trial, the district court authorized the government to medicate Gillenwater involuntarily to render him competent to face the charges against him. While recognizing the important interests at stake for both the government and Gillenwater, we conclude that the district court did not err in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. Ruiz-GaxiolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Hernandez-VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Abraham CruzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Nna OnuohaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. People v. Bendovid, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. United States v. Darlene FiesteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. Joseph BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API