United States v. Joseph Brooks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge:
Among the most weighty decisions our society can make is to subject someone to a powerful medication against his or her will. The government must meet the demanding standard set by the Supreme Court in Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166, 123 S.Ct. 2174, 156 L.Ed.2d 197 (2003), before involuntary medication may be administered in an effort to restore a defendant’s competency to stand trial. This case requires that we consider whether the district court appropriately authorized involuntary medication in order to render Joseph Brooks competent to stand trial for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Clark v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Hernandez-VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Abisai Rivera-GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Nna OnuohaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Darlene FiesteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- State v. J. D. B.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2024