United States v. Abraham Cruz
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
We here confront an issue of first impression: whether the Government, pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166, 123 S.Ct. 2174, 156 L.Ed.2d 197 (2003), can have a sufficiently important interest in forcibly medicating a defendant to restore his mental competency and render him fit to proceed with sentencing. Under the facts presented in this case, we answer that question in the affirmative and we will affirm.
I
A
Cruz was arrested in August of 2011 and indicted on one count of assaulting, resisting, or impeding Social Security…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Matthews v. CopelandDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Buddy's Plant Plus Corp v. Centimark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Darlene FiesteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Abraham CruzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Bainbridge v. GarlandDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.