Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1930No. Docket Nos. 4142, 4143, 4144PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Three separate actions are combined and presented for our consideration upon this appeal. The three actions are presented, in part, upon one transcript and argued in one set of briefs. The actions are prosecuted to obtain a judgment for. damages based upon fraud and deceit, alleged to have been practiced upon the respective plaintiffs by the defendant in the sale of distinct and separate parcels of land to the respective plaintiffs, one tract of land being sold to the plaintiffs Stevens, one tract of land to the plaintiffs Layton, and one…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Teague v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Suhr v. LauterbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Tropic Builders, Ltd. v. Naval Ammunition Depot Lualualei Quarters, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Haley v. Santa Fe Land Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Rivera v. City of CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Wilbur v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API