Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Britter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 7, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 28, 2007, which ruled, among other things, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked at a home improvement store as a part-time sales associate. She asked her supervisor if she could take three days off from work to take final exams and was told that she would need to get the approval of the human resources manager. Claimant did not get the manager’s approval and called in sick on the three days that she had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ChiouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of KesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. In re the Claim of SedlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of RiversAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Matter of Malcolm (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API