Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Sedlack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 28, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked for the employer as a payroll clerk for approximately two years. In response to her complaints of sexual harassment, the employer sent a cautionary memorandum to all employees. Shortly thereafter, claimant contacted a former employee to obtain information concerning the alleged sexual harassment and, as a result, became involved in a heated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re TordsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of OwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re AlvarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re the Claim of ChiouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BritterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of MinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API