PHC-Minden, L.P. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson
The United States Constitution prohibits a court from exercising jurisdiction over a party that lacks minimum contacts with the forum. Personal jurisdiction has been described as either specific — that is, based on contacts arising from the dispute at issue — or general, predicated on a party’s “continuous and systematic” contacts with the forum. Minimum-contacts analysis is easily muddled, however, as courts frequently import contacts relevant to one type of jurisdiction when deciding the other. Additionally, courts sometimes impute contacts of related entities to each other, when mere…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by306 opinions
- Moncrief Oil International, Inc. v. Oao Gazprom, Gazprom Export, LLC, and Gazprom Marketing & Trading, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
- Wooley v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Spir Star AG v. KimichTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- SSP Partners v. Gladstrong Investments (USA) Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- M & F Worldwide Corp. v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
301 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.