Legal Opinion

Spir Star AG v. Kimich

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2010No. 07-0340PublishedCited by 277 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

A foreign manufacturer sold its products in Texas through a Texas distributor. We must decide whether the use of that distributorship insulates the manufacturer from the reach of a Texas court when one of the products injures a Texas citizen. We hold that a manufacturer is subject to specific personal jurisdiction in Texas when it intentionally targets Texas as the marketplace for its products, and that using a distributor-intermediary for that purpose provides no haven from the jurisdiction of a Texas court. Because, in this case, personal jurisdiction comports with traditional notions of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by277 opinions

  1. TV Azteca v. RuizTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. M & F Worldwide Corp. v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Cornerstone Healthcare Group Holding, Inc. v. Nautic Partners Vi, L.P., Reliant Splitter, L.P., and Kennedy Plaza Partners Vi, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. Texas Department of Transportation v. Malcolm G. Dyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011

272 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API