Legal Opinion

Carol Judy Higashi v. United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 6, 2000No. 99-5152UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RADER, Circuit Judge.

Ms. Carol Judy Higashi sought a redress payment and an apology under 50 U.S.C. app. § 1989 (1994) (the Act) for her exclusion from her parents’ original place of residence during World War II. The United States Court of Federal Claims denied the claim on summary judgment. See Higashi v. United States, 44 Fed.Cl. 238 (1999). Because at the time of her birth neither Ms. Higashi nor her family were under any legal restraint preventing their return to their original place of residence, this, court affirms.

I

Ms. Higashi was born in Boise, Idaho, on February 6, 1945. Three years…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Douglas L. Ishida v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Murakami v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Federal Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Murakami v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Murakami v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. United States v. Southern Union Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API