Murakami v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
After an ordered remand, this case is again before the court on cross-motions on the administrative record. Plaintiff seeks review of the Attorney General’s denial of his claim for redress under the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 (the Act), 50 U.S.C. app. § 1989, et seq. (1988 & Supp. V 1993). The Act establishes a comprehensive program for paying restitution to individuals of Japanese ancestry who were interned, relocated or otherwise deprived of their liberties. See 50 U.S.C. app. § 1989b-4(a) & (b).
Having carefully reviewed the briefs filed herein, the court determines…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Murakami v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murakami v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Kelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Kelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025