Legal Opinion

Murakami v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 31, 2003No. 99-55CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

After an ordered remand, this case is again before the court on cross-motions on the administrative record. Plaintiff seeks review of the Attorney General’s denial of his claim for redress under the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 (the Act), 50 U.S.C. app. § 1989, et seq. (1988 & Supp. V 1993). The Act establishes a comprehensive program for paying restitution to individuals of Japanese ancestry who were interned, relocated or otherwise deprived of their liberties. See 50 U.S.C. app. § 1989b-4(a) & (b).

Having carefully reviewed the briefs filed herein, the court determines…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Murakami v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murakami v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Kelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  3. Kelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API