Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. Lindberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 1987No. C5-86-654PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

We granted the petition of appellant La-rey Evans Lindberg to review a decision by the Court of Appeals which held that a jury damage award less than the stipulated amount of damages was inadequate as a matter of law. We reverse.

Gerald Flanagan commenced this action seeking damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident with Lind-berg. In response to a request from the trial court, the parties stipulated as to medical expenses for purposes of offsetting any damage award by the amount of medical expenses incurred and paid by respondent’s insurance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. GaravaliaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Rud v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Flanagan v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Oulman v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Heine v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Pulkrabek v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Rush v. JostockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Peters v. Independent School District Number 657Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API