Legal Opinion
Doody v. Schriro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 20, 2008No. 06-17161PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Seventeen-year-old Johnathan Doody was interrogated overnight for twelve hours straight. When, after several hours, he fell silent and refused to answer the officers’ questions, the officers persisted, asking dozens of questions, many over and over again, and telling him he had to answer them. The resulting confession was used in Arizona state court to convict him of multiple counts of murder and robbery. He now petitions for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that (1) the warnings he received pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Doody v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Ambrose v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Doody v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. MayerWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Steven Catlin v. Ronald BroomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.