Doody v. Schriro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Concurrence by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge TALLMAN.
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
This case emerged from a horrendous crime — the murder of nine individuals, including six monks, inside a Buddhist temple. The ensuing investigation ensnared Petitioner Johnathan Doody, a seventeen-year old high school student. Although Doody eventually confessed to participating in the nine murders, he now challenges his confession, asserting that the Miranda 1 advisements he was given were inadequate and that his confession was involuntary. We agree on both counts.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Moor v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Doody v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Cooke v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Ryan v. DoodySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.