Legal Opinion
Doody v. Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2011No. 06-17161PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Concurrence by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge TALLMAN.
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
This case emerged from a horrendous crime — the murder of nine individuals, including six monks, inside a Buddhist temple. The ensuing investigation ensnared Petitioner Jonathan Doody, a seventeen-year old high school student. Although Doody eventually confessed to participating in the nine murders, he challenged his confession, asserting that the Miranda1 advisements he was given were inadequate and that his confession was involuntary. In our opinion reported at 596 F.3d…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- United States v. Tymond PrestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Armis Arrendondo v. Dwight NevenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Alexander Balbuena v. William SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Jessie Rodriguez v. Mike McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.