Legal Opinion

Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 26, 2003No. A109610Published

1Per curiam

In this proceeding pursuant to ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges the validity of OAR 255-050-0005(2)(c). That rule authorizes the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision to postpone an inmate’s scheduled release date if the inmate refuses to participate in a psychiatric or psychological evaluation ordered by the board. Petitioner argues that the rule exceeds the board’s authority granted under ORS 144.223. Petitioner further, and alternatively, asserts that the rule is facially unconstitutional as violating state and federal constitutional provisions pertaining to free expression and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gholston v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API