First Union Real Estate Equity & Mortgage Investments v. Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
It is well-established that the proper test for determining the true value of real estate for taxation purposes is the price agreed upon by a seller, willing to sell but under no compulsion to sell, and a buyer, willing to buy but under no compulsion to buy. That basic principle is not disputed and it is consistent with the controlling statute, R.C. 5713.03, which read, during tax year 1986, in pertinent part:
“The county auditor, from the best sources of information available, shall determine, as nearly as practicable, the true value of each separate tract * * * of real property and of * * *…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Board of Revision v. FodorOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Landerhaven v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Trebmal Landerhaven v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1995