Loughlin v. Idora Realty Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtRattigan, J.
According to the -allegations of the complaint, this action arises from a fraudulent real estate transaction wherein, as a result of false representations made to plaintiffs by their real estate broker, their property was sold to the broker’s mother-in-law without their knowing her identity, and was immediately sold to others at a significantly higher price. The action was brought to recover secret profits allegedly made by all defendants in the transaction, plus interest and punitive damages.
Plaintiffs Joseph Loughlin and Frances Loughlin, husband and wife, commenced the action against the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Simone v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Adams v. HermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Alhino v. StarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Timmsen v. Forest E. Olson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- George Albert Curry v. Lawrence E. Wilson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Smith v. ZakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.