Legal Opinion
Principal Life Insurance v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 17, 2006No. 02-1278 TPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
“The principle of looking through form to substance is no schoolboy’s rule; it is the cornerstone of sound taxation____”1
“Any one may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes.”2
When does a taxpayer cross the fault line between the cheering fields of tax planning and the forbidding elevations of form over substance, far enough, at least, to require a transaction to be recharacterized for tax purposes? No…
2Cases cited119 opinions
- New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clearmeadow Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- HAWAII INSURERS COUNCIL v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- H.J. Heinz Co. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.