Legal Opinion

Principal Life Insurance v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 17, 2006No. 02-1278 TPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

“The principle of looking through form to substance is no schoolboy’s rule; it is the cornerstone of sound taxation____”1
“Any one may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes.”2

When does a taxpayer cross the fault line between the cheering fields of tax planning and the forbidding elevations of form over substance, far enough, at least, to require a transaction to be recharacterized for tax purposes? No…

2Cases cited119 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clearmeadow Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. HAWAII INSURERS COUNCIL v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. H.J. Heinz Co. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API