Legal Opinion

H.J. Heinz Co. & Subsidiaries v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 25, 2007No. 03-2847TPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

“A given result at the end of a straight path is not made a different result because reached by following a devious path.”1

All tax students are familiar with the concept of “basis,” which, in the income tax law, is the touchstone for measuring income and loss. Generally speaking, it is basis that prevents the double taxation of income reflected in a property’s cost, by allowing that cost to be recovered, tax-free, upon the' asset’s disposition. And it is basis, again, that measures the loss realized if the seller recovers less than its investment in property. Sometimes,…

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stobie Creek Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Wells Fargo & Co. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Clearmeadow Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API