Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Kleinman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 19, 1982No. 10079PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmentano, J.

This appeal arises from a judgment ordering the conservator of the estate of an incapable person to sell a parcel of real property located in Hartford.1

*64Harry H. Kleinman, the defendant, was appointed conservator of the estate of Charles H. Miller on April 25, 1979. Prior to that date the plaintiff, Beverly Marshall, had managed her father’s affairs. The estate consists principally of Connecticut real property having a substantial value. The sizeable medical expenses of the ward and other expenses of the conservatorship, however, far exceed the income from estate property, creating a cash flow…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prince v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Kearney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Johnson's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  4. Elmendorf v. PoprockiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Norton v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kerin v. StangleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Department of Social Services v. SaundersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Finizie's Appeal from ProbateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  4. Forsyth v. Rowe, No. Cv91-0396327s (Oct. 7, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API