Legal Opinion
Kerin v. Stangle
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 29, 1988No. 13364PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
This is the appeal of an action wherein the plaintiff, Jon S. Kerin, claimed that he was entitled to a decree against Frank J. Stangle, the administrator of the estate of Charles H. Miller, ordering specific performance of an agreement to sell certain of Miller’s real estate located in the town of Bloomfield. The matter was tried to the court, Goldberg, J., which rejected *262the plaintiffs arguments and refused to order specific performance or grant the plaintiff other equitable relief. We find no error.
The real estate holdings of Charles H. Miller have had a tortuous history of litigation…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Baskin's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Slattery v. WoodinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Prince v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Avery, Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- In re Baby Z.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In re Michaela Lee R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Hall v. SchoenwetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Gardner v. BalboniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.