Legal Opinion

Goldsleger v. Velella

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1932No. Appeal 13PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an appeal by Sarah Velella of defendants from the order of the court below, discharging a rule to show cause why the judgment entered against her should not be opened and she be permitted to defend.

The judgment was entered on February 2, 1927, in favor of plaintiff, Golda Goldsleger, against Sarah Velella, appellant, and Antonio Velella, her husband, on a promissory note under seal, purporting to have been executed by both defendants, containing warrant of .attorney for confession of judgment, bearing date January 31,1927, and calling for the payment of $1,000…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Real Estate Inv. Co. v. RoopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. Pine Brook Bank v. KearneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Murray v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Kemper v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Munn, Trustee v. LorchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Western National Bank v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Third National Bank & Trust Co. v. TonkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Gordon v. Miller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API