Pine Brook Bank v. Kearney
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,
Plaintiff appeals from an order making absolute a rule to show cause why judgment entered by confession upon a promissory note should not be opened. By the terms of the instrument, dated May 6,1925, upon which the judgment is based, defendant, Mary J. Kearney, sole obligor, promised to pay the Pine Brook Bank, plaintiff, the sum of $5,000, “one day after date for value received.” Following the text of the note, and the usual clause authorizing confession of judgment, appears a certification as follows: “I......do hereby certify that this note is given for my…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- National Finance Corp. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sears v. BirbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Helzlsouer, to Use v. GolubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Munn, Trustee v. LorchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Wilkes-Barre Deposit & Savings Bank v. HermannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Bianca, Jr. v. KaplanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.