Legal Opinion

Pine Brook Bank v. Kearney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1931No. Appeal, 102PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,

Plaintiff appeals from an order making absolute a rule to show cause why judgment entered by confession upon a promissory note should not be opened. By the terms of the instrument, dated May 6,1925, upon which the judgment is based, defendant, Mary J. Kearney, sole obligor, promised to pay the Pine Brook Bank, plaintiff, the sum of $5,000, “one day after date for value received.” Following the text of the note, and the usual clause authorizing confession of judgment, appears a certification as follows: “I......do hereby certify that this note is given for my…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Finance Corp. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sears v. BirbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Helzlsouer, to Use v. GolubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Munn, Trustee v. LorchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Wilkes-Barre Deposit & Savings Bank v. HermannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Bianca, Jr. v. KaplanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API