Kemper v. Richardson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 160, April T., 1919, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Butler County, December T., 1916, No. 13, discharging rule to open judgment in casé of Paul R. Kemper for the use of Anthony Thoma v. Sara Richardson. Rule to open judgment. Before Reiber, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court discharged the rule to open the judgment. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, P. J.,
This cáse presents circumstances that are so frankly admitted, and so confidently relied on to sustain the action of the court, that it is necessary to restate the undisputed facts and apply to them the reasonable inferences as fixed by our decisions.
The plaintiff is a money broker, and was applied to by W. E. Richardson for a loan of $200. After some negotiations Kemper agreed to loan $200 to Richardson and took his note for that amount signed by Richardson and by his mother, as a surety. Before the money was paid it was discovered that Mrs. Richardson was a married…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Charles D. Kaier Co. v. O'brienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- R. Patrick & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Real Estate Inv. Co. v. RoopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Sibley v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Newhall v. ArnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Western National Bank v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Cronauer v. BayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Goldsleger v. VelellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Third National Bank & Trust Co. v. TonkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.