Legal Opinion

Woodle v. Settlemyer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Multnomah: Robert G. Morrow, Judge. This is an action by Claude P. Woodle against George T. Settlemyer on an undertaking for an appeal and for a stay of proceedings. The facts are set forth in the opinion of the court. Department 1.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey

On the 5th day of December, 1912, the plaintiff recovered against W. H. Harrington, in the justice’s court for the district of Portland, in Multnomah County, a judgment for the sum of $150, with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from July 27, 1912, and the further sum of $12.50 for costs of said action.

On the 26th day of December, 1912, the plaintiff caused an execution to be issued upon said judgment, and placed the same in the hands of the constable of said Portland district for service. Said constable, by virtue of said writ, levied upon certain property of said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Odell v. WoottenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1868
  3. Steinhauer v. ColmarColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Kirschbaum & Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  5. State, Use of Williams v. DaytonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peacock v. KirklandOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Dugas v. New York Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. Smyth v. George W. Bates & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Pan American Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API