Legal Opinion

State, Use of Williams v. Dayton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Garrett County.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

This suit was brought by the appellant to recover damages from the appellees for an alleged wrong committed by the appellee Dayton while acting as a constable. The declaration alleges that Dayton gave bond to the State, with the other appellees named in the writ, conditioned for the faithful performance of the duties of the office of constable, and that he did not faithfully execute the duties of that office, in that he had a writ of fieri facias in his hands, issued on a judgment against one Mary Beedle, to be served in a right and lawful manner, but. instead of so doing,.entered the store…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Vanderworker v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  3. State Ex Rel. German v. TimmonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ingo v. KochCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Greenberg v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State Ex Rel. Brooks v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Lyngholm v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Woodle v. SettlemyerOregon Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API