Legal Opinion

Kirschbaum & Co. v. Blair

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 25, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond, rendered Eebruary 3, 1898, in a proceeding by motion for a judgment, wherein the plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs, and the defendants in error were the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

' This is a writ of error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond, and the facts of the case out of which the suit arises are practically uncontroverted. They are as follows:

W. H. Weisiger and S. M. Weisiger, of Richmond, Va., styling themselves W. H. Weisiger & Bro., or Weisiger & Bro., as they will be spoken of in this opinion, entered into a written contract with A. B. Kirschbaum & Co., wholesale clothing merchants of the city of Philadelphia, whereby Weisiger & Bro. agreed to travel for and sell the clothing of Kirschbaum & Co. in the States o‘f Rorth Carolina,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  2. Miller v. SherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Belloni v. . FreebornNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Gates v. . McKeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  5. Simonson v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southwood Builders, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. American Bankers Insurance Company Of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. Merritt v. BuntingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  4. Reid v. RhodesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  5. Chamberlain v. Marshall Auto & Truck Ctr., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API