Smyth v. George W. Bates & Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This was an action for money had and received. The complaint alleges that the defendant, a banking company, received for the use and benefit of one Harry Howard $2,393.99 on August 14, 1915; $2,586.82 on July 7, 1916 (later found not to have been received by defendant), and $136.36 on October 25, 1918, which sums were received from the sale of certain bonds. Defendant’s amended answer denies the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint and as a further and separate answer and defense alleges: That Harry Howard had borrowed the sum of $2,075 from defendant, for which sum he had given defendant his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wood v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Ainsworth v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Fishburne v. Merchants BankWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Wehrung v. DenhamOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Woodle v. SettlemyerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Estate of BrowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Browning v. EikenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Jeter v. Citizens National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967