Duquesne Light Company v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
Resolution of this appeal requires us to address two principal issues with respect to the approval by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency of the sulfur oxide emission limitations in the implementation plan adopted by Pennsylvania in response to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970: 1(1) Did the Administrator act arbitrarily in concluding that compliance with the challenged emission limitations within the time allowed by the plan is economically feasible for the petitioning utilities’ coal-burning electric generating plants through…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- International Harvester Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Getty Oil Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Union Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- The Bunker Hill Company v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Smith v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.