The Bunker Hill Company v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner challenges the actions of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in rejecting portions of the State of Idaho’s implementation plan under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1857, et seq. (Supp. 1977), and substituting therefor its own regulations. See 40 Fed.Reg. 53584 (1975). The rejected portions of the Idaho implementation plan deal with the control of sulfur dioxide (S02) from the Idaho plant of petitioner. The petitioner’s challenge relies on several grounds. While we find in favor of the Administrator on various legal and procedural issues, we remand…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- International Harvester Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Public Power Council v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Kennecott Copper Corporation, Nevada Mines Division, McGill Nevada v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- National Lime Association v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.