Legal Opinion

Accelerated Receivable Solutions v. Hauf

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2015No. S-14-0178PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶1] Accelerated Receivable Solutions (ARS) filed a claim against the Estate of Margaret A. Hauf (Estate). The Estate disallowed the claim and sent notice of the disallowance to ARS via certified mail. The certified mailing was returned to the Estate unclaimed. Months later, ARS learned of its disallowed claim and filed a complaint in district court objecting to the disallowanee of its claim and seeking judgment on the claim. The Estate moved to dismiss the complaint as untimely, and the district court granted that motion. ARS appeals the dismissal, asserting both statutory and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Robinson v. HanrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Britain v. Britain (In re Estate of Britain)Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Heather A. Harada v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Stacy R. Dellit v. Joshua M. TracyWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Charley Collins v. COP Wyoming, LLC a Wyoming Limited Liability Company and Roger RossWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Monaghan Farms, Inc. v. The Board of County Commissioners of Albany County, Wyoming and ConnectGen Albany County LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API