Legal Opinion

Heather A. Harada v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2016No. S-15-0181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[T1] Heather Harada pled guilty to third degree sexual assault in exchange for a deferred prosecution and five years of probs tion. After Ms. Harada had served close to four years of probation, the district court entered an order modifying the terms of her probation to require that she submit to and pay for a psychosexual evaluation. Ms. Har-ada appeals that order claiming that there was no change of cireumstances, rehabilitation benefit, or community protection interest to justify modifying the probation order and the district court therefore abused its disceretion in ordering…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sorenson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hicklin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Peterson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael Angelo Sena, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Anderson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Daniel Ivan Villafana v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API