Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Crandall Ex Rel. Johnson v. Society Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 27, 2004No. 03-1453PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

¶ 1. Dana, Jack and Linda Cran-dall appeal a summary judgment dismissing their claims against Society Insurance. The court concluded that the Society policy did not provide underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage for injuries Dana suffered in an automobile accident. The Crandalls argue that (1) the policy provides UIM coverage because Jack's garage operations are located in Wisconsin, and (2) the accident meets all the policy's requirements for UIM coverage. We disagree and affirm the order.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. Jack Crandall owns Crandall Auto Body, located in Spring Valley. He has a Garage Business…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bushey v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Taylor v. Greatway InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Grotelueschen Ex Rel. Doherty v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Clark v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ruenger v. SoodsmaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  2. Lisowski v. Hastings Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lisowski v. Hastings Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lisowski v. Hastings Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API