Legal Opinion

Frank v. Maliniak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

Defendant is a licensed physician, specializing as a plastic surgeon. About thirteen years before plaintiff placed herself under defendant’s care she had submitted to operative treatment whereby the flatness of her nose had been relieved and its end lifted and tilted. This had been accomplished by the insertion of paraffin in a manner which changed the shape and outline of the nose. With the passage of time, however, the paraffin filtered into the cheeks forming bumps, which detracted from her beauty. Heat and cold due to seasonal atmospheric changes acted alike in causing red spots to appear…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Busch v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Noel v. ProudSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Baum v. TurelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. Dixon v. KantorCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  4. Carpenter v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Carpenter v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API