Legal Opinion

Noel v. Proud

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1961No. 42,352PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an action against a physician by a patient wherein breach of an express warranty is alleged as the basis for the recovery of damages. Appeal has been duly perfected by the defendant physician from an order of the trial court overruling a demurrer to the amended petition.

The question presented is whether the petition states a good cause of action sounding in contract or one in tort for malpractice. The statute of limitations would bar the latter but not the former.

The petition was filed January 30, 1960, in the district court of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Robins v. FinestoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Tefft v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  4. James v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Tulloch v. HaseloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Brooks, Tarlton, Gilbert, Douglas & Kressler, Etc., Cross-Appellants v. United States Fire Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Malone v. University of Kansas Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Bonin v. VannamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Nishi v. HartwellHawaii Supreme Court · 1970

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API