Dixon v. Kantor

Is the defense which sets up discharge in bankruptcy valid in this case?

The trial was without a jury. Decision was reserved.

There are two plaintiffs, Helen Dixon, who was injured, and her husband, Russell Dixon, who seeks to recover consequential damages. Two defendants are named but only defendant Kantor was served with process. He will be referred to as “ defendant.” He was the employer of Gross, whose name also appears in the title. Kantor operated a “ beauty parlor.” For a fee he undertook to adorn plaintiff Helen Dixon with a “ wave ” or “ ringlets.” In the course of the work he injured…