Legal Opinion

Baum v. Turel

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 27, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, District Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment by two of four defendants. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. For the reasons indicated below, the motion is granted as to the first and second causes of action in the complaint and denied as to the third.

Plaintiff Fred S. Baum underwent surgery on April 4, 1955, for the repair of a right inguinal hernia. The operation was performed in New York City by defendant Dr. Solomon J. Turel (“Turel”), a New York resident, at Wickersham Hospital (“Wickersham”). Wickersham is a named defendant in this action. In connection…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Robins v. FinestoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  5. Tulloch v. HaseloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. ForgraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Simcuski v. SaeliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Laughlin v. ForgraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API