Legal Opinion

Brutton v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1853PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Dearborn Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

It is charged that Brutton sold liquor without license. Motion to quash overruled. Tidal and judgment for the state.

It is objected to the information that it does not negative the exception in the first section of the act of 1853 as to the sale of liquor for sacramental, mechanical, chemical, medicinal and culinary purposes. The law in relation to exceptions in a statute is well settled. If the exception be contained in a subsequent clause or statute, it is matter of defence and need not be negatived in the information. Thus the statute of 1 Elizabeth, c. 2, punishing absence from church, the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Steinkuehler v. WempnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bishop v. State ex rel. GrinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Russell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Jalbert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Jensen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API