Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1875PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From tbe Marion Criminal Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskibk, J.

The appellant was indicted and convicted, in the court below, for the desecration of the Sabbath, by superintending, controlling, and carrying on a barber-shop on Sunday. A motion to quash the indictment was made and overruled, and an exception taken. This ruling is assigned for error.

The objection urged to the indictment is, that it does not negative all the exceptions contained in the body of the act. The statute, among other things, excepts “ works of charity and necessity.” The indictment alleges that it was not a work of charity, but omits the words “ and necessity.” The objection is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dillon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Brutton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Colson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  4. Peterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Steinkuehler v. WempnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Walter Lyles v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ferner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Miller v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API