Legal Opinion

Tenney v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 14, 1968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Chief Justice:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Chancery granting leave to intervening plaintiffs to file an amendment to the intervening complaint. The action is a derivative one brought on behalf of the Tenney Corporation. Named as defendants are various directors and officers of the Tenney Corporation, all nonresidents of Delaware, some of whom have appeared in the action in response to the coercive effect of a sequestration of their property under 10 Del.C. § 366.

Following the appearance of the individual defendants, the original complaint was amended twice with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wright v. ScottonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1923
  2. Scotton v. WrightCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
  3. Kilbourne v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Townsend Corp. of America v. DavidsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  5. L'HOMMEDIEU v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bokat v. Getty Oil CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  2. Hogg v. WalkerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  3. Greyhound Corporation v. HeitnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  4. Wilmington Trust Co. v. BarrySuperior Court of Delaware · 1979
  5. Guarantee Bank v. Magness Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API