Wright v. Scotton
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Pennewill, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court.
The first, second and third assignments of error go to the question of parties. It is contended by the appellants, that the covenant sued on, having been made with George P. Scotton, one of the complainants, individually, and no assignment of the covenant having been shown, the other complainants who became part*407ners with George P. Scotton in the garage business, are not entitled to any relief for the breach of said covenant, and cannot, therefore maintain this action.
Whether George C. Scotton and Lyman J. Scotton,1 two of the complainants,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Phillips v. ThompsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- My Laundry Co. v. SchmelingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Swanson v. KirbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Public Opinion Publishing Co. v. RansomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Haugen v. SundsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Reid v. SpazioSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Harold Kraft v. Wisdomtree Investments, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
- Vichi v. Koninklijke Philips ElectronicsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- iac/interactivecorp v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- United States Cellular Investment Co. of Allentown v. Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.