Legal Opinion

Hogg v. Walker

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 16, 1993PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

The plaintiff, Monica Lewis Hogg, appeals from the Court of Chancery’s refusal to grant her petition for a Rule to Show Cause and Writ of Attachment to compel the distribution of an $8,000 corpus held in a constructive trust by the defendant Gerald Walker (“Walker”). Because the defendant had dissipated the trust corpus, the Court of Chancery ruled that it could not compel the defendant to disgorge that which he did not have. Hogg challenges this ruling on several grounds. Her primary claim, however, is that the court erred as a matter of law in concluding that the defendant’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Meadows v. BierschwaleTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Adams v. JankouskasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. McMahon v. New Castle AssociatesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
  5. Buffum v. Peter Barceloux Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. SIGA Technologies, Inc. v. PharmAthene, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Schock v. NashSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  3. Teachers' Retirement System v. AidinoffCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  4. Longview Energy Company v. the Huff Energy Fund Lp, Wrh Energy Partners LLC, William R. "Bill" Huff, Rick D'angelo and Riley-Huff Energy Group LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  5. McNeil v. McNeilSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API