Legal Opinion

Guarantee Bank v. Magness Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 5, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILLY, Justice:

This appeal and cross-appeal arise out of a decision of the Court of Chancery which determined the priority of the conflicting claims of Guarantee Bank (Guarantee) and Magness Construction Co. (Magness) to the proceeds of a foreclosure sale of two parcels of land located in Mill Creek Hundred known as “Red Barn”. Parcel I (improved parcel) consists of an improved parcel of land on which a restaurant formerly known as the Red Barn sits. Parcel II (unimproved parcel) is an undeveloped lot which sits across the street from Parcel I.

In 1975 Magness held a long term leasehold…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Vickers Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. Wilmont Homes, Inc. v. WeilerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  3. First Mortgage Co. of Pennsylvania v. Federal Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Tenney v. JacobsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  5. Bullen v. DaviesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Handler Construction, Inc. v. CoreStates Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. Joseph v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1984
  3. In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
  4. Galantino v. BaffoneSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  5. In re Tribune Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API